Not to be outdone by the glossy‐haired Biebs or the sequin‐suited halves of LMFAO, Shakira showed up dressed like a giant present. Apparently, she'd taken a few tips from TSwift (a.k.a. the Kaufman Franco magpie), as she accessorized her sequined dress with glittery heels, a glittery clutch, and what looked like Beyonce's signature glittery pantyhose.
Dear Bradley Cooper,
You know something's wrong when Lindsay Lohan looks better than you:
You know something's wrong when Lindsay Lohan looks better than you:
Since when did you morph into the greasy-haired hobo you played in Limitless? Last time I checked, the sloppy couch potato in serious need of a haircut transformed into the dazzling, designer-wearing womanizer, not the other way around. Props to Hollywood's favorite bad girl for a good clean-up, but there's still no excuse for looking more like a druggie than LiLo.


In typical supermodel fashion, Karolina chose Chanel. After all, how many people can pull off the above dress without looking like they got stuck in a tablecloth? Although it wasn't horrible, it wasn't terribly flattering either. I hate to say this of haute couture, but it looked more like an over-blinged Vegas costume than a runway-worthy masterpiece. Not to mention that her neck looked inordinately long in its Paris Hilton-esque choker, and the sloping cut of the sides was doing nothing for her seemingly scrawny shoulders. Combined with her 6' tall svelteness, Karolina looked more like a cross between a bizarrely clad alien and an oversized avian creature. Compounding the tackiness was a strand of fake-looking, unnaturally white pearls and golden Jimmy Choos that glittered (hello, kindergarten dress up?). And, um, unpedicured toes - we get that it's nice to go natural, but it just looks like you forgot your appointment at the salon. The metallic Chanel bag with vaguely sparkly leather on the sides didn't help matters much, either. Hey, at least her hair was cute!
This season's It girl continues with a whirlwind of blue-chip calendars and campaigns. Most recently, she's the face of Giorgio Armani's spring collection. In "La Femme Bleu," lensed by Nick Knight, Sednaoui wears a composite ensemble composed of curiously disparate elements. From the neck up, her windswept turban evoke the desert riders of Africa or the veiled sheiks of the Middle East; however, she is also wearing a plunging, glittering ballgown. Her arms are also inexplicably tanned and sweaty, whereas her upper body and face remain strangely pale. Maybe ombre is the newest tanning trend, or perhaps she accidentally dipped her hands in a vat of L'Oreal Bronzed Goddess. Either way, her lower half looks like it belongs to an exercise editorial, not a coolly moonlit Armani campaign. It only gets more confusing with the alien-like, strangely positioned hands. Her left one looks plastic, while her right looks scarily mutated. Her second finger has apparently been replaced by a quasi-thumb that blends sketchily into her dress. Confusing, but not in a good way. Perhaps there is some higher idea involved (as there always is in haute couture), but in this case it looks like there's a few too many.
Amongst all the sentiments designer wish to inspire, boredom (to the point of tears) is one they usually seek to avoid. Then why was Fendi so darn drab? Of course, it earned rave reviews from every prominent critic. And though it is sometimes possible to understand how others might see beauty where one remarks only the absence of it, Fendi's so-called charm was purely inexplicable. Of quality there was surely plenty, but of true aesthetic genius there was none. Take, for example, overdyed bootcut jeans that stumpified even the extremely svelte legs of a 5'10" model. A couple of boxy jackets seemed awkwardly stiff; the shoulders on a black-and-white dress made its wearer seem like it was caught in the midst of a permanent shrug. The color combos were anything but vivid: fleshy beige, dusty blue, and muddy claret. Despite the brand's reputation for modernity, their latest presentation looked decidedly dated - and not in a vintage-cool way. Alone, perhaps, the pieces might have done well, but together they were uninspiring. The only redeeming factors were the black bandage shoes and a couple of flattering dresses with plunging necklines and cascading pleats. But it wasn't enough to save the collection. Karl Lagerfeld has a tendency to either hit or miss, and this effort placed it firmly in the latter category. If you liked his latest showing, however, you'll find plenty of others in agreement.
And finally, let's not forget the models, who appeared curiously shiny, pallid, and eyebrowless (which has been - unfortunately - a raging runway trend ever since Balenciaga 2008). In short, they looked like Annalynne McCord on a bad makeup day:
Equally intriguing were silver nose rings that were more Aztec than Athens. The piercings seemed somewhat inharmonious with the floaty fabrics, minimal makeup, and "optimism" that Wang described.
Though they promised a shampooing disaster, white splotches of hair paint were artistic and innovative. Random sections of coated hair protruded in spikes from atop their heads. From afar, they resembled silvery feathers. Practical? No. But they were fiercely futuristic and arrestingly avant-garde.
Alexander Wang's cool-girl cred has already earned him a coveted spot among fashion's elite. But Wang is always pushing for something new, and the moto jacket and skinny jean have become more cliche than cutting-edge. Spring is the season of rebirth, after all, and Wang took that interpretation literally, citing "optimism" and "purity" as inspirations - this coming from the former engineer of rugged, grungy chic. Consequently, the collection featured not a hint of black, blue denim, or leather - Wang's usual mainstays. Au contraire, the presentation stuck to one color, or rather the absence thereof. The whole exhibition looked like it had been whitewashed, models included. Ironically, the first few looks - a series of glorified bedsheets - were anything but optimistic. Fortunately, Wang began playing with textures, volumes, and fabrics to create more diverse - if not more colorful - creations. Cropped canvas jackets, silk harem pants, and button-up skirts with industrial accents embodied the effortlessness of previous seasons. In this case, the all-white palette united complex layering into cohesive ensembles. Of particular interest was a cropped, fuzzy sweater with a turned-down collar that promised to be both sublimely chic and irresistibly comfortable. Wang took another step in the right direction with bias-cut silk smocks in pale pastels. If that sounds too ladlylike, consider that Wang left them slightly crinkled and adorned them with metallic strips meant to simulate duct tape. A gorgeously eclectic floral dress topped with a futuristic, transparent anorak was another interesting juxtaposition. The closing numbers, however, were somewhat anticlimatic. Oversized trenches looked too much like bathrobes to even qualify as coats. Worse yet was their horrific color, which was somewhere between mustard yellow and burnt sienna. Though the end wasn't quite the grand finale (and the beginning wasn't promising, either), let's not forget the gleams of ingenuity that shone in between.
all photos from nymag.com
all photos from nymag.com
For a season in which designers are harkening back to a bygone era of maturity, Carolina Herrera - the poster girl for elegant over-60 dressing - returned to classic silhouettes and subdued modesty. While labels like Balmain and Versace prefer to expose miles of leg, Herrera has always offered a refined, elegant take on dressing for those who are no longer coltish 20 year olds (or at least look like one). Yet with this collection, she turned the clock too far - several pieces read more "mumsy" than "sophisticated." Take, for instance, a couple of her less inspired creations:
all photos from style.com
all photos from style.com
I'm not entirely sure that Ms. Herrera didn't run out of material and decide to cut these from her living room wallpaper. Hey, it has been done before - like in Enchanted (not that I ever watched that, of course). Anyways, although I admire her ability to sew ballgowns from household decorations, I (and my eyes) severely protest that horrific shade of vomit-green. Even the model doesn't look too psyched to be wearing it - and honestly, I wouldn't be, either. Not to mention the confusing motif (are they flowers? marshmallows? dust bunnies?) and the hideous hot pink bow that clashes with the aforementioned pattern. The second dress is marginally better, but it possesses the same is-it-wallpaper? syndrome as its less fortunate predecessor. Maybe the pieces would look better separately (the top would go well with black trousers), but together they appear too fussy, boring, and matchy-matchy. The belt presents another problem - it appears to be no more than a glorified ribbon. If your customers splurge thousands on a couture dress, why not provide a luxurious waist-cincher to complement it?
Not all of the collection was as abysmal, but the majority of the pieces were, if not shocking, yawn-inducing.
This looks rather fierce, no? It's very Missoni-clad gypsy meets Sports Illustrated model with a dash of garden party (hence the floral wedges). As you know, it's very au courant to look effortlessly undecided about the weather - is it summer or winter? We don't know - her autumn wrap seems to suggest cooler temperatures, but she's obviously ready to hit the beach. The rest of the Kenzo collection was similarly uncoordinated; a series of beturbaned garden warriors emerged in oversized smocks, fuschia kimonos, and the occasional maillot, sporting clutches so large that they could double as duffel bags. One baggy-crotched, high-necked floral jumpsuit was positively frightening. The chaos ensued with little-house-on-the-prairie balloon blouses and foliage-hued poodle skirts. At last, respite arrived in the form of sporty pastel anoraks, origami-sleeved trenches, and nifty bow-topped belts. This season's ubiquitous short suit took on a relaxed sophistication with an slouchy jacket and looser fit. Overall, it was an interesting proposition - and if it wasn't exactly easy on the eyes, at least it was original.
all photos from style.com
So apparently the Twilight cast reached a general consensus to wear something feathery and/or pastel-colored. How else do you explain this?
It's no secret that Kristen Stewart dresses for comfort rather than style, but wearing a cutout bathmat to a premiere is a bit extreme. On the other hand, it stands out amongst the mundane cocktail numbers that typify standard red carpet fare. It's intriguing, interesting, and atypical - dare I say I love it? Dakota Fanning went with a safer choice - the nude tone subdued the embellishment, but the feather fringe gave it a bit of edge. Pretty? Yes, but also boring. Alternatively, Nikki Reed took a chance with a birdlike confection (Marchesa?) that mimicked an hourglass shape and emphasized her impressive muscle tone. Ashley Greene's floor-sweeping gown, though it was beautifully draped, did nothing for her figure. The train seemed a bit out of line with her costars' shorter hemlines, but its lack of pattern and basic design made it casual enough for the event. Their male counterparts, however, were less aesthetically pleasing:















































